[PS] some people seem to be heavily overscheduled

Rachel Silber rachel.silber at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 11:53:34 EST 2007


I am not saying what the solutions are at this point, only pointing out the
problem.
Rachel

On Dec 3, 2007 11:46 AM, Benjamin Levy <deguspice at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 3, 2007 9:40 AM, Rachel Silber <rachel.silber at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Some people seem to be heavily overscheduled.  My experience in the past
> is
> > that 3 panels back-to-back is not a good idea for almost anyone, and
> that
> > more than 2 Friday/3 Saturday/ 2 Sunday is also a bad idea.  With the
> new 4
> > day con, the numbers might be more like 2 Fri/ 3 Sat/3 Sun / 1 Mon.
>  There
> > are a few exceptions to this rule but we should make sure that they are
> > people we either know personally or can ask before schedules get
> published.
>
>  If we've only heard back from half of the panelists so far, I think
> we should wait a bit before we start moving around panelists and
> panels .  At this point the obvious solution might be to move a panel,
> but later the solution might be to drop the panelist (perhaps later
> will have 8 people signed up for the panel, and most of them have
> given it a higher rank).
>   ---Ben
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://arisia.org/pipermail/program-staff/attachments/20071203/e3590e2f/attachment.htm 


More information about the program-staff mailing list