[PS] operational change to support not messing things up (any more)

[krista ernewein]

Tonight, I plan to make some adjustments to changes made yesterday. I plan
to call Michael and chat wiht him beofre moving panels (or rather undoing
panel changes) Afterwards I will make time to put in the program notes that
a GoH is on the panel.

Then I will send out the schedule to be reviewed (as i promised would
happen). Hopefully few changes will need to made afterwards. that's my game
plan so far and happy to hear thoughts.
-Krista

On 12/3/07, Rachel Silber <rachel.silber at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Until we get the schedule kind of firmed up, and everyone more familiar
> with this year's interesting constraints, we really need a way to mark
> certain items as special items that should only be changed with the
> permission of the programming divhead.
>
> My suggestion is to add a prefix to all the relevant titles.  I would say
> that that prefix could be GOH, but it should also be put on the 501st panels
> and *possibly* on panels that have special requirements.   Would the letters
> DHO (for DivHeadOnly) be clear enough?  Or DNM (Do Not Move)?
>
> Zambia folks, I am making a feature request for a checkbox that puts this
> prefix (whatever we decide it is) into a title field in the reports and
> operational screens but doesn't change the title in the database so we can
> give clean data to pubs.  Likely that's not something we can do Right Now,
> but for the next few weeks until pubs is the major database consumer it
> seems reasonable for us to change the data.
>
> Any comments on this idea?
>
> Rachel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://arisia.org/pipermail/program-staff/attachments/20071203/5f1c5013/attachment.htm