[PS] operational change to support not messing things up (any more)

[Tracy Gangwer]

On Dec 3, 2007 1:23 PM, Rachel Silber <rachel.silber at gmail.com> wrote:
> The following things would make it easier to get to the programming notes at
> the right moment:
> 1)  active links from session id on the Maintain Room Schedule (
> http://two-step.netbusters.com/~trg/arisia08/MaintainRoomSched.php) page.

done.

> 2) active links from session id on the following reports that I'm likely to
> be using to resolve conflicts
>
> http://two-step.netbusters.com/~trg/arisia08/allpartschedbyparttimereport.php
> http://two-step.netbusters.com/~trg/arisia08/allroomschedreport.php
> http://two-step.netbusters.com/~trg/arisia08/allroomschedtimereport.php
>  http://two-step.netbusters.com/~trg/arisia08/allroomschedtrackreport.php

done.

> 3) a box on the manage session page in which I could search by number for a
> session given the id.

Not tonight...   too much work for tonight.

> I'm glad to have the feedback about not circumventing the design of the
> tool.  I'd love to hear from other program staff people about what they
> think will work for them.
> Rachel
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 1:10 PM, Tracy Gangwer <trgangwer at gmail.com> wrote:
> > All kinds of interesting notes could be in there.
> > Just ignoring them is almost certainly wrong.
> > Where do you need them to show up?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > trg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 3, 2007 12:55 PM, Rachel Silber <rachel.silber at gmail.com > wrote:
> > > The point of my suggestion is that the rest of the schedule is still (I
> > > think) subject to a significant amount of change and that means that
> it's
> > > still possible for us to inadvertently move the wrong things when we are
> > > resolving issues. If you're going to be editing the panel descriptions
> > > anyway, adding (GOH) as a prefix to the title will really be helpful.
> As
> > > you have noticed, the notes to program committee are not easily visible
> when
> > > you're working with the scheduling screens, but the program title is.
> > >
> > > Rachel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 3, 2007 12:47 PM, krista ernewein < kernewein at gmail.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Tonight, I plan to make some adjustments to changes made yesterday. I
> plan
> > > to call Michael and chat wiht him beofre moving panels (or rather
> undoing
> > > panel changes) Afterwards I will make time to put in the program notes
> that
> > > a GoH is on the panel.
> > > >
> > > > Then I will send out the schedule to be reviewed (as i promised would
> > > happen). Hopefully few changes will need to made afterwards. that's my
> game
> > > plan so far and happy to hear thoughts.
> > > > -Krista
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/3/07, Rachel Silber <rachel.silber at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Until we get the schedule kind of firmed up, and everyone more
> familiar
> > > with this year's interesting constraints, we really need a way to mark
> > > certain items as special items that should only be changed with the
> > > permission of the programming divhead.
> > > > >
> > > > > My suggestion is to add a prefix to all the relevant titles.  I
> would
> > > say that that prefix could be GOH, but it should also be put on the
> 501st
> > > panels and *possibly* on panels that have special requirements.   Would
> the
> > > letters DHO (for DivHeadOnly) be clear enough?  Or DNM (Do Not Move)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Zambia folks, I am making a feature request for a checkbox that puts
> > > this prefix (whatever we decide it is) into a title field in the reports
> and
> > > operational screens but doesn't change the title in the database so we
> can
> > > give clean data to pubs.  Likely that's not something we can do Right
> Now,
> > > but for the next few weeks until pubs is the major database consumer it
> > > seems reasonable for us to change the data.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any comments on this idea?
> > > > >
> > > > > Rachel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>